Twelve Books – Rapture, Antichrist, False Prophet, End Time Signs, Bible Prophecy, Nando

End Times Bible Prophecy News and Articles

Archive for the ‘United States’ Category

Sept 28, 2014 OBAMA THE ANTICHRIST, OBAMA CODE #2 BY: JOHN TNG

leave a comment »

OBAMA THE ANTICHRIST, OBAMA CODE #2 BY: JOHN TNG

Mr. John Tng of http://www.fivedoves.com has a long list of discovery articles where he has uncovered secret hidden information in the Bible, in Obama’s life, events, pictures and otherwise normal every day occurrences that identify him as the Antichrist.

As a good detective and researcher Tng looks for clues, patterns, names, places, events, scriptures and facts that tie Obama to the Bible chapters and verses that God gave us to confirm the identity of the 666 Antichrist.

The reason He has done this is because the man of sin the 666 is a serpent as well as a chameleon who changes colors and camouflages his identity to avoid detection while in the process of consolidating his power to take the whole world for Satan his father.

Do your eyes look and do not see, do your ears listen but do not hear, do you lack the motivation to find out and do not care? If these words describe you when you hear that Obama is the Antichrist then you will be among the deceived multitudes at the end times and especially at the time of judgment that is called the Apocalypse and that it will soon engulf the whole world for a period of seven years or 2,520 days.

This article is relevant to the church of Jesus Christ today as well as the Nation of Israel that will soon find themselves involved in Jacob’s troubles (Jeremiah 30:7) with the Antichrist trying to appear as the long awaited Messiah.

Friday my computer hard disk crashed and the man that fixes my computer came and it gave me the opportunity to speak to him again about the identity of Obama. This man used to work for me and we are good friends. Ever since 2008 he has been a sympathizer of Obama and I have been showing him a copious evidence to substantiate my claim of the identity of the Antichrist. He knows my knowledge of scripture and Bible prophecy and in his reasoning he replies to me: what actions have Obama taken that makes him a bad person? Has he acted like Castro? Or like Hitler? Are his actions those of a dictator?

The answer is yes but the enormous apparatus that supports and hides him keeps the facts from surfacing in a meaningful way and the façade is effective in maintaining an image or mask that hides the man, it is for this reason that the work of John Tng and others including this writer is important.

My introduction is, do you have eyes to see and ears to listen?

Nando

http://www.fivedoves.com/obamacode/obamacode_2.html

John Tng (28 Sep 2014)
“ObamaCode#2: Obama and 666″

Dear Doves,

Obama seems to act like a strange attractor of the number 666. Consider this weird coincidence: Obama will be 55 years and 6 months old at the end of his second term of office (12 noon Jan 20, 2017); that is precisely 666 months since his birth!

In terms of the number of days, Obama will have lived 20,259 days on his last day as the President of the United States. This big number can be written as a sum of 6+6+6 numbers:

6 numbers: 793+1458+793+1458+793+1458
6 numbers: 793+1458+793+1458+793+1458
6 numbers: 793+1458+793+1458+793+1458
====================================
Total: 20,259

The number 793 is the English gematria of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and the number 1458 is the English gematria of BARRY SOETORO, his real name !!!!!!

There are 666 numbers between 793 and 1458 including the first and the last numbers: 793(BHO), 794, ……., 1457, 1458(BS) !!!!!!

If we arrange the 6+6+6 numbers in a circle, the number 666 appears 6+6+6 times !!!!!!

20259 as sum of 6+6+6 names of antichrist
So, the number 20,259 is rather significant in pinpointing Obama the antichrist.

In my previous article on Jim Bramlett’s rapture puzzle (see link), I showed that the numbers concealed there provide very strong evidence that the Holy Spirit is saying Obama is the antichrist. Recall the six scriptures and one statement that contain the word ‘go’ given to Jim by God:
Isa 45:2
Isa 52:12
“He will not go out with nervous compulsion or with fear.”
Isa 55:12
Ex 33:14
Jg 6:14
Ge 28:15

On day 17919 of Obama’s life since birth, he and family had their summer vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, an island located south of Cape Cod in Massachusetts. MARTHA’S VINEYARD, called “Noepe” by the Indians, means in their picturesque language “in the midst of the sea” (see link). The phrase “in the midst of the sea” is taken straight out of the Book of Revelation where Scripture describes the beast as rising up OUT OF THE SEA (Re 13:1)! “In the midst of the sea” is precisely “out of the sea”!

But more intriguingly, day 17919 is the 666th day since Obama declared to the world that he was going to change it on 29 Oct 2008, which is day 17254 of Obama’s life since birth. What does this have to do with Jim’s puzzle?

It turns out the number 17919 is encoded in Jim’s six scriptures spectacularly!
452
+ 5212
+ 5512
+ 3314
+ 614
+ 2815
=======
Sum: 17919

What are the odds of such a coincidence?

But even more spectacular is the errie coincidence below:
With this double witness, it is clear that the Holy Spirit is hinting very strongly that Obama is the man stamped with the number of the beast.

Look up, our redemption is at the door!

John

Nando end

Sept 21, 2014 Further proof Obama the 666 Antichrist

leave a comment »

This morning Mr. John Tng posted another excellent work of biblical discovery that uncovers Obama as the Antichrist. Without a doubt the overwhelming evidence uncovered and the many simultaneous occurrences related to him can not be explained to have occurred by chance and not by design.

Barack Hussein Obama is the Antichrist and this article below shows once more evidence that applies only to him.

John Tng concludes that Obama’s remaining time in power as President is running out and the Apocalypse must start before for him to take full control of the earth. Of course the Rapture must be first as John stated.

Nando

http://www.fivedoves.com/obamacode/obamacode_1.html

John Tng (21 Sep 2014)
“ObamaCode#1: The Number of the Beast”

——————————————————————————–

Dear Doves,

Time is fast approaching for all things prophetic to wrap up. Obama’s remaining days in office is only 852 days away, or 2 years and 4 months. As time is fast running out, I will try to write as much as I can concerning numbers the LORD has shown me pinpointing the identity of the antichrist.

I recently viewed a YouTube clip by ppsimmons on the 7 strange coincidences associated with Obama at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UOKTNFMgQ8; it was published on Nov 17, 2008, within 2 weeks after Obama won his first presidential election.

I was particularly impressed by the fifth coincidence documented in the video clip; it is related to the number of the beast. The author (presumably Carl Gallups) resorted to English gematria to calculate the number of the beast (A=1, B=2, …… I=9, J=10, K=20, …… R=90, S=100, T=200, …… Z=800). You may be aware that I am the first person on the Internet who identified Obama as the antichrist using the English gematria of his name BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, which has a value of 793 (I wrote many articles on it; see link).

So I was a little surprised that Gallups managed to obtain a value of 666 using the same English gematria that I used. It turns out he calculated the number of Obama’s derived name based on the meanings of his name. Barack in Arabic means BLESSED; Hussein in Arabic means HANDSOME; and Obama is an African word meaning LEANING. Hence,

BLESSED = 2 + 30 + 5 + 100 + 100 + 5 + 4 = 246
HANDSOME = 8 + 1 + 50 + 4 + 100 + 60 + 40 + 5 = 268
LEANING = 30 + 5 + 1 + 50 + 9 + 50 + 7 = 152

The total value is 246 + 268 + 152 = 666 !!!!!!

Wow!

Since my own research took a different path in nailing the antichrist, the fact that Gallups was able to compute the exact value of 666 using the same English gematria that I used, lends a lot of credence to my work and confirms that Obama is the man of sin.

The LORD appears to have planted many clues in His Word for us end-time watchers to search out concerning the identity of the antichrist. For example, there is only one verse in the Bible having a gematria value (whether Hebrew or Greek) of 666; this verse is found in Num 10:20 (see link).

The Book of Numbers chapter 10 is the 127th chapter of the Bible (127=50+40+27+10).

How interesting the difference between 793 (BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA) and 666 (BLESSED HANDSOME LEANING) is precisely 127 !!!

Obama is fast running out of time; that means our departure is closer than we think!

John

Nando end

Sept 18, 2014 Should Israel’s enemies fear their nuclear weapons or their God?

with 3 comments

Many years ago the release of the book The Sampson Option caused quite a stir. The book was about the revelations of Mordecai Vanuno an ex employee in the nuclear reactor of Dimona. He revealed at the time that Israel was in the possession of a nuclear arsenal that could be close to 300. This disclosure landed Vanuno in a controversy with the State of Israel who sent a team to kidnap him in England and bring him back to face Israeli justice. Vanuno was imprisoned many years and was released but has remained imprisoned to the borders of Israel.

It is important to understand that Israel is a very small nation with less than 9 million Jews. The Islamic nations populations are in the order of more than 1+ billion and want to destroy the nation of Israel. Proof of this fact is that in the 66 years of the founding of the State there have been 3 major wars launched against it with the purpose of genocide or annihilation.

What the world does not see to their detriment is that the God of Israel which is the true God who created all that is seen and unseen, whose power is infinite has a purpose for Israel which He considers His people, and will be their protector forever. It is not Israel strength and weapons that their enemies should fear, but their God the Holy Trinity.

Nando

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrives to a cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, on June 29, 2014.

Israel’s Worst-Kept Secret

Israel has a substantial arsenal of nuclear weapons.

Former CIA Director Robert Gates said so during his 2006 Senate confirmation hearings for secretary of defense, when he noted—while serving as a university president—that Iran is surrounded by “powers with nuclear weapons,” including “the Israelis to the west.” Former President Jimmy Carter said so in 2008 and again this year, in interviews and speeches in which he pegged the number of Israel’s nuclear warheads at 150 to around 300.

But due to a quirk of federal secrecy rules, such remarks generally cannot be made even now by those who work for the U.S. government and hold active security clearances. In fact, U.S. officials, even those on Capitol Hill, are routinely admonished not to mention the existence of an Israeli nuclear arsenal and occasionally punished when they do so.

The policy of never publicly confirming what a scholar once called one of the world’s “worst-kept secrets” dates from a political deal between the United States and Israel in the late 1960s. Its consequence has been to help Israel maintain a distinctive military posture in the Middle East while avoiding the scrutiny—and occasional disapprobation—applied to the world’s eight acknowledged nuclear powers.

But the U.S. policy of shielding the Israeli program has recently provoked new controversy, partly because of allegations that it played a role in the censure of a well-known national-laboratory arms researcher in July, after he published an article in which he acknowledged that Israel has nuclear arms. Some scholars and experts are also complaining that the government’s lack of candor is complicating its high-profile campaign to block the development of nuclear arms in Iran, as well as U.S.-led planning for a potential treaty prohibiting nuclear arms anywhere in the region.

The U.S. silence is largely unwavering, however. “We would never say flatly that Israel has nuclear weapons,” explained a former senior State Department official who dealt with nuclear issues during the Bush administration. “We would have to couch it in other language, we would have to say ‘we assume’ or ‘we presume that Israel has nuclear weapons,’ or ‘it’s reported’ that they have them,” the former official said, requesting that his name not be used due to the political sensitivity surrounding the topic.

President Barack Obama made clear that this four-decade-old U.S. policy would persist at his firstWhite House press conference in 2009, when journalist Helen Thomas asked if he knew of any nations in the Middle East with nuclear arms. “With respect to nuclear weapons, you know, I don’t want to speculate,” Obama said, as though Israel’s established status as a nuclear-weapons state was only a matter of rumor and conjecture.

So wary is Paul Pillar, a former U.S. national-intelligence officer for the Middle East, of making any direct, public reference to Israel’s nuclear arsenal that when he wrote an article this month in The National Interest, entitled “Israel’s Widely Suspected Unmentionables,” he referred to warheads as “kumquats” throughout his manuscript.

Even Congress has been coy on the subject. When the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published a 2008 report titled “Chain Reaction: Avoiding a Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East,” it included chapters on Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey—but not Israel. The 61-page report relegated Israel’s nuclear arms to a footnote that suggested that Israel’s arsenal was a “perception.”

“This report does not take a position on the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons,” the report said. “Although Israel has not officially acknowledged it possesses nuclear weapons, a widespread consensus exists in the region and among experts in the United States that Israel possesses a number of nuclear weapons. For Israel’s neighbors, this perception is more important than reality.”

While former White House or cabinet-level officers—such as Gates—have gotten away with more candor, the bureaucracy does not take honesty by junior officials lightly. James Doyle, a veteran nuclear analyst at Los Alamos National Laboratory who was recently censured, evidently left himself open to punishment by straying minutely from U.S. policy in a February 2013 article published by the British journal Survival.

“Nuclear weapons did not deter Egypt and Syria from attacking Israel in 1973, Argentina from attacking British territory in the 1982 Falklands War or Iraq from attacking Israel during the 1991 Gulf War,” Doyle said in a bitingly critical appraisal of Western nuclear policy, which angered his superiors at the nuclear-weapons lab as well as a Republican staff member of the House Armed Services Committee.

Even though three secrecy specialists at the lab concluded the article contained no secrets, more senior officials overruled them and cited an unspecified breach as justification for censuring Doyle and declaring the article classified, after its publication. They docked his pay, searched his home computer, and, eventually, fired him this summer. The lab has said his firing—as opposed to the censure and search—was not related to the article’s content, but Doyle and his lawyer have said they are convinced it was pure punishment for his skepticism about the tenets of nuclear deterrence.

Neither Doyle nor his colleagues revealed if the sentence in his article about Israel’s arsenal was the one that provoked officials to nitpick about a security violation, but several independent experts have surmised it was.

Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said the clues lie in the Energy Department’s citation—in a document summarizing the facts behind Doyle’s unsuccessful appeal of his ill treatment—of a classification bulletin numbered “WPN-136.”

The full, correct title of that bulletin, according to an Energy Department circular, is “WNP-136, Foreign Nuclear Capabilities.” The classification bulletin itself is not public. But Aftergood said Doyle’s only reference to a sensitive foreign nuclear program was his mention of Israel’s, making it highly probable this was the cudgel the lab used against him. “I’m certain that that’s what it is,” Aftergood said in an interview.

The circumstances surrounding Doyle’s censure are among several cases now being examined by Department of Energy (DOE) Inspector General Gregory Friedman, as part of a broader examination of inconsistent classification practices within the department and the national laboratories, several officials said.

Doyle’s reference to the existence of Israel’s nuclear arsenal reflects the consensus intelligence judgment within DOE nuclear weapons-related laboratories, former officials say. But some said they find it so hard to avoid any public reference to the weapons that classification officers periodically hold special briefings about skirting the issue.

“It was one of those things that was not obvious,” a former laboratory official said, asking not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the topic. “Especially when there’s so much about it in the open domain.”

Israel’s nuclear-weapons program began in the 1950s, and the country is widely believed to have assembled its first three weapons during the crisis leading to the Six-Day War in 1967, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a nonprofit group in Washington that tracks nuclear-weapons developments.

For decades, however, Israel itself has wrapped its nuclear program in a policy it calls amimut, meaning opacity or ambiguity. By hinting at but not confirming that it has these weapons, Israel has sought to deter its enemies from a major attack without provoking a concerted effort by others to develop a matching arsenal.

Israeli-American historian Avner Cohen has written that U.S. adherence to this policy evidently grew out of a September 1969 meeting between President Richard Nixon and Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir. No transcript of the meeting has surfaced, but Cohen said it is clear the two leaders struck a deal: Israel would not test its nuclear weapons or announce it possessed them, while the United States wouldn’t press Israel to give them up or to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and would halt its annual inspections of Dimona, the site of Israel’s Negev Nuclear Research Center.

As an outgrowth of the deal, Washington, moreover, would adopt Israel’s secret as its own, eventually acquiescing to a public formulation of Israeli policy that was initially strenuously opposed by top U.S. officials.

“Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East,” the boilerplate Israeli account has long stated. “Israel supports a Middle East free of all weapons of mass destruction following the attainment of peace.” When Nixon’s aides sought assurances that this pledge meant Israel would not actually build any bombs, Israeli officials said the word “introduce” would have a different meaning: It meant the country would not publicly test bombs or admit to possessing them, leaving ample room for its unacknowledged arsenal.

“While we might ideally like to halt actual Israeli possession,” then-National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger wrote in a July 1969 memo to Nixon that summarized Washington’s enduring policy, “what we really want at a minimum may be just to keep Israeli possession from becoming an established international fact.”

Even when Mordechai Vanunu, a technician at Dimona, provided the first detailed, public account of the program in 1986 and released photos he had snapped there of nuclear-weapons components, both countries refused to shift gears. After being snatched from Italy, Vanunu was imprisoned by Israel for 18 years, mostly in solitary confinement, and subsequently forbidden to travel abroad or deal substantively with foreign journalists. In an email exchange with the Center for Public Integrity, Vanunu indicated that he still faces restrictions but did not elaborate. “You can write me again when I am free, out of Israel,” he said.

The avoidance of candor has sometimes extended to private government channels. A former U.S. intelligence official said he recalled being flabbergasted in the 1990s by the absence of any mention of Israel in a classified document purporting to describe all foreign nuclear-weapons programs. He said he complained to colleagues at the time that “we’ve really got a problem if we can’t acknowledge the truth even in classified documents,” and finally won a grudging but spare mention of the country’s weaponry.

Gary Samore, who was President Obama’s top advisor on nuclear nonproliferation from 2009 to 2013, said the United States has long preferred that Israel hold to its policy of amimut, out of concern that other Middle Eastern nations would feel threatened by Israel’s coming out of the nuclear closet.

“For the Israelis to acknowledge and declare it, that would be seen as provocative,” he said. “It could spur some of the Arab states and Iran to produce weapons. So we like calculated ambiguity.” But when asked point-blank if the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons is classified, Samore—who is now at Harvard University—answered: “It doesn’t sound very classified to me—that Israel has nuclear weapons?”

The U.S. government’s official silence was broken only by accident, when, in 1979, the CIA released a four-page summary of an intelligence memorandum titled “Prospects for Further Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the Natural Resources Defense Council, a nonprofit environmental group.

“We believe that Israel already has produced nuclear weapons,” the 1974 report said, citing Israel’s stockpiling of large quantities of uranium, its uranium-enrichment program, and its investment in a costly missile system capable of delivering nuclear warheads. Release of the report triggered a spate of headlines. “CIA said in 1974 Israel had A-Bombs,” a New York Times headline declared. “Israel a Nuclear Club Member Since 1974, CIA Study Indicates,” announced The Washington Star.

But it stemmed from a goof.

John Despres, who was the CIA’s national-intelligence officer for nuclear proliferation at the time, said he was in charge of censoring or “redacting” the secret material from the report prior to its release. But portions he wanted withheld were released, he said in an interview, while sections that were supposed to be released were withheld.

“This was a sort of classic case of a bureaucratic screw-up,” said Despres, now retired. “People misinterpreted my instructions.” He said that as far as he knows, no one was disciplined for the mix-up. Moreover, in 2008, when the National Security Archive obtained a copy of the document under the Freedom of Information Act, that judgment remained unexcised.

But Washington’s refusal to confirm the obvious in any other way has produced some weird trips down the rabbit hole for those seeking official data about the Israeli arsenal. Bryan Siebert, who was the most senior career executive in charge of guarding DOE’s nuclear-weapons secrets from 1992 to 2002, said he recalls seeing a two-cubic-foot stack at one point of CIA, FBI, Justice, and Energy department documents about Israel’s nuclear program.

John Fitzpatrick, who since 2011 has served as director of the federal Information Security Oversight Office, confirmed that “aspects” of Israel’s nuclear status are considered secret by the United States. “We know this from classifying authorities at agencies who handle that material,” said Fitzpatrick, who declined to provide more details.

Kerry Brodie, director of communications for the Israeli embassy in Washington, similarly said no one there would discuss the subject of the country’s nuclear status. “Unfortunately, we do not have any comment we can share at this point,” she wrote in an email. A former speaker of the Israeli Knesset, Avraham Burg, was less discrete during a December 2013 conference in Haifa, where he said “Israel has nuclear and chemical weapons” and called the policy of ambiguity “outdated and childish.”

Through a spokesman, Robert Gates declined to discuss the issue. But a growing number of U.S. experts agree with Burg.

Pillar, for example, wrote in his article this month that the 45-year-old U.S. policy of shielding Israel’s program is seen around the world “as not just a double standard but living a lie. Whatever the United States says about nuclear weapons will always be taken with a grain of salt or with some measure of disdain as long as the United States says nothing about kumquats.”

Victor Gilinsky, a physicist and former member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission who has written about the history of the Israeli program, complained in a recent book that “the pretense of ignorance about Israeli bombs does not wash anymore. … The evident double standard undermines efforts to control the spread of nuclear weapons worldwide.”

J. William Leonard, who ran a government-wide declassification effort as President George W. Bush’s director of the Information Security Oversight Office from 2002 to 2008, commented that “in some regards, it undermines the integrity of the classification system when you’re using classification to officially protect a known secret. It can get exceedingly awkward, obviously.”

Aftergood said the secrecy surrounding Israel’s nuclear weapons is “obsolete and fraying around the edges. … It takes an effort to preserve the fiction that this is a secret,” he said. Meanwhile, he added, it can still be abused as an instrument for punishing federal employees such as Doyle for unrelated or politically inspired reasons. “Managers have broad discretion to overlook or forgive a particular infraction,” Aftergood said. “The problem is that discretion can be abused. And some employees get punished severely while others do not.”

Dana H. Allin, the editor of Doyle’s article in Survival magazine, said in a recent commentary published by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London that “anyone with a passing knowledge of international affairs knows about these weapons.” He called the government’s claim that the article contained secrets “ludicrous” and said Doyle’s ordeal at the hands of the classification authorities was nothing short of Kafkaesque.

Nando

Sept 4, 2014 Prophecy update by Pastor Faraq

leave a comment »

This week Pastor JD Farq covers the middle east and relates it to prophecy as he usually does.

Keep in mind that he is of Egyptian and Palestinian decent and knows the people in the area involved.

Nando

Nando end

Aug 29, 2014 ISIS and Islam a threat to all by JD Farag

with one comment

Islam has been a threat to Western civilization and the world since the time of Mohamed. There are two branches of Islam and both present a mortal danger to democracies and the rest of the non Muslim world.

Islam mascarades as a religion of peace while the Qumran tells the opposite. It is a brutal dictatorship with the intent of world conquest and domination. In areas where it dominates it becomes and imposes a government with sharia law. People are forced to submit to their system or become slaves. It treats women and non Muslims as lower than animals.

The danger is real and free societies should rally to pass laws that forbid Islam in all its forms. The basis for this assessment is that Islam promotes the killing and enslavement of subjects. They can not co-exist with other humans who do not promote their ideology or religion and they kill and maim to obtain their goals of domination. Is Islam the only peril in the world today, no!!!, but it is the one who is attracting the most attention.

There is also the threat of those who want to impose a one world government and impose a dictator whom we call the Antichrist. Behind these forces we can find Satan who will use Islam to start a WWIII that will give the opportunity to these behind the scene people to conquer the world.

What is going on at the moment is the preamble of the time known in the Bible as the Apocalypse which will last seven years of 360 days each.

Jesus Christ returns to earth at the end of this period and will purge the nations of all evil doers. Then the one thousand year kingdom of Jesus Christ will start.

 

August 12, 2014 Insanity rules in the middle east

leave a comment »

There are so many military, religious and political-economical currents in the middle east that is difficult to asses what will happen next. The article linked below gives a good view of the uncertainties confronting Israel and all the other players involved in this deadly war.

Nando

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sunil-sharan/four-currents-shaping-the_b_5666282.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Nando end

August 11, 2014 The Islamic State advances like a storm with terror and beheadings

leave a comment »

As the following news link tells, the advances of the IS Islamic State are gained by the force of arms, terror, beheading and crucifixion. As all followers of Islam are in reality followers of Satan, they resort to the use of force and terror to force submission to Allah (Satan). Their advance is meteoric and rapid and if not confronted the inertia they have will carry them to one victory after the other as the resistance they experience melts away as if non existing.

The question to answer is the following: Jesus when he commissioned Peter (Mathew 16:18) said: (KJV)  (And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it), but IS is prevailing in this area and other forms of Islam prevailing in other areas to the exclusion of Christianity. Will Jesus permit this to happen in contradiction to His words above? No!!! which means that He will take His church out of the world to bring the inhabitants of the earth into judgement as prophesied in the book of Revelation ( http://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/1.htm ).

The Rapture is coming very soon and the judgment will follow at its heals.

Islamic State beheads, crucifies in push for Syria’s east

http://news.msn.com/world/islamic-state-beheads-crucifies-in-push-for-syrias-east

Nando

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 154 other followers