Twelve Books – Rapture, Antichrist, False Prophet, End Time Signs, Bible Prophecy, Nando

End Times Bible Prophecy News and Articles

Archive for August 27th, 2010


The article here was in the September Magazine of Zola Leviitt. It shows the true nature of Islam.
If you do not have this newsletter sent to your home go to their web site and subscribe, also if you can help them monetarily.


which detail the life of Mohammed
after his arrival in Medina, over 70 are
about raids, battles, and assassinations
or else they are about preparations for
raids and battles, division of spoils,
odes upon battles, names of those
who fought, etc. According to a content
analysis done by Bill Warner of
the Center for the Study of Political
Islam, at least 75% of the sira is about
jihad. These are inconvenient facts for
those who hope Islam can be reformed.
No matter how reform-minded you
may be, it is difficult to come up with
a symbolic interpretation of the Koran’s
numerous calls to make war on unbelievers,
since that was literally what
Mohammed did.
So, rather than encourage Muslims to
remove the violent and hateful parts of
the Koran, it might make more sense
to encourage them to renounce it in
toto. The “good” parts of the Koran are
so bound up with the “bad” parts that
trying to separate them is an impossible
task. Besides, there is no warrant
in Islamic tradition for picking and
choosing. Islamic authorities say that
the Koran given to Mohammed is a
replica of the original which is inscribed
on “imperishable” tablets in heaven.
And, just for the record, “imperishable”
beats “set in stone” by a wide margin.
Talking of reforming Islam by re-interpreting
the Koran is like talking about
reforming a marble statue. Some things
don’t lend themselves to reformation.
Conflict In The Koran
By William Kilpatrick,
Every now and then you hear calls from
critics of Islam for Islam to reform itself
—for mosques and madrassas (schools)
to teach against the Islamic doctrines
that inspire terrorists. A dramatic
example of this demand occurs in
the film Fitna when filmmaker Geert
Wilders invites Muslims to tear the
offending pages out of the Koran. In
one scene you can hear the sound of
tearing pages in the background.
If thy page offend thee, pluck it out?
The only trouble with this sort of
recommendation is that it assumes
that there is enough positive material
in the Koran and other foundational
documents to form the basis for a
reformation. But is there?
According to Moorthy Muthuswamy, an
expert on political Islam, “61 percent
of the Koran talks ill of unbelievers or
calls for their violent conquest and
subjugation, but only 2.6 percent talks
about the overall good of humanity.”
Hmmm. Seems as though that would
amount to an awful lot of offending
It’s a similar story when you turn to the
sira, the biographies of Mohammed.
Take the earliest of these, the one written
by Ibn Ishaq. Of the 130 short chapters

Written by twelvebooks

August 27, 2010 at 7:50 pm

Posted in antichrist, eschatology, Islam

Tagged with

Aug 27, 2010 Marianne Haworth (27 Aug 2010) “American’s muslim heritage?”

The sooner that the people of the USA realize that Islam is a dangerous and mortal enemy of the free societies and countries of the world the better prepared we will be to repel the attack that is sure to come from these people called Muslims.

The following letter is well researched and written congratulations to its author.


Marianne Haworth (27 Aug 2010)
American’s muslim heritage?

Hi John and doves, I got this in an email. Interesting…..God bless, Marianna.

Barack OBAMA, during his Cairo speech,  said:   “I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of  America ‘s story.”


Dear Mr. Obama:

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed?  Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?  Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution?

Declaration of Independence ?

Bill of Rights?

Didn’t think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England ?  No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ?  No, they did not.  In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery.  Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.”  Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?  Not present.

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country’s Woman’s Suffrage era?  Again, not present.  In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.  So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the ‘hajib’ or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband.  Yep, the Muslims are all for women’s rights, aren’t they?

Where were Muslims during World War II?  They were aligned with Adolf Hitler.  The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi’s in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?  If they weren’t flying planes into the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East ….  No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day.  Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo , Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11.  To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here in America .

Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates.  They were Muslim.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 – the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan .

That, Mr. Obama is the “Muslim heritage” in America .

Written by twelvebooks

August 27, 2010 at 7:34 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Aug 27, 2010 How to Survive in a World Great Depression

The article in reference here is about survival in very adverse economic conditions like the 1930’s.

Surviving in the mist of a devastating war would be much more difficult but it would still be possible with the help of God and the proper tools.

The article illustrates the importance of work and community involvement.


Politics, News & Issues:


// <![CDATA[
// <![CDATA[
function hideTabs() {
/* Show only the tabs we want to see. Hide all the rest */
for (var i=0; i < num_of_tabs; i++) {
if (i max_index) {
document.getElementById(“channelTab” + i).style.display = “none”;
} else {
document.getElementById(“channelTab” + i).style.display = “block”;

/* Hide the scrolling arrows we don’t need */
if (min_index > 0) {
document.getElementById(“leftArrowOff”).style.display = “none”;
document.getElementById(“leftArrowOn”).style.display = “block”;
} else {
document.getElementById(“leftArrowOff”).style.display = “block”;
document.getElementById(“leftArrowOn”).style.display = “none”;

if (max_index

// <![CDATA[

// <![CDATA[

// <![CDATA[

Get a Widget for this title

Top economists: The second Great Depression has arrived

2 of 2


Written by twelvebooks

August 27, 2010 at 7:22 pm

Aug 27, 2020 MIDEAST PEACE TALKS We’ve been here too many times BY CAL THOMAS

The main drive in Islam and the Muslim religion is the conquest and subjugation of the whole world. Those who will not submit to the will of their god allah will be killed.

There will never be a lasting peace between the State of Israel and their Muslim neighbors. The whole purpose of this peace treaty charade is to make Israel take an indefensible position from which Islam can then attack and obliterate the Israelis.

The columnist Cal Thomas has a column in the Miami Herald today concerning the quest for a Middle East peace in the last century. History will support the argument against doing such  a peace treaty.

Unfortunately we know that the Antichrist Barack Hussein Obama will eventually bring this about at the start of the Tribulations this fall.



We’ve been here too many times


`Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

Never has George Santayana’s oft-quoted warning had greater significance than when it comes to Middle East “peace talks,” including the latest round scheduled to begin Sept. 2 in Washington, D.C. In constantly pressuring Israel to go far beyond the multiple and unreciprocated concessions it has already made, the United States ensures repetition of past mistakes, which will produce the same outcome.

Some history and the results for those who would learn:

• The Balfour Declaration (1917) and the Palestinian Mandate (1922). These called for the formation of a Jewish homeland while recognizing “nothing shall be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” The Arab response: A series of riots, largely instigated by Mufti Mohammad Amin al-Husayni.

• The Peel Commission (1936) was formed to investigate the cause of the Arab Revolt (1936-1939). The commission recommended the partition of Jews and Arabs. The Zionist Congress accepts the proposal as the basis of negotiation. The Arab response: Outright rejection and a continuation of the revolt.

• U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine (1947) proposed a two-state solution and a divided Jerusalem supervised by the United Nations. The Arab response: Outright rejection, followed by violence. When Israel declared its independence, May 15, 1948, armies of the neighboring Arab states invaded. According to the secretary general of the Arab League at the time, Azzam Pasha, the goal was “a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades.”

• Oslo Accords (1993). Negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians lead to a Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements. The response, according to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The killing continues. By one estimate, almost 300 people were killed by Palestinian terrorism between 1993 and 2000.

• The Camp David Offer (2000). Prime Minister Ehud Barak offers PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat most of what he asks for. The response: rejection and the second intifada, which according to Israel’s Foreign Ministry, killed more than 500 and injured more than 8,000.

There were other “peace talks” and initiatives, among them the Madrid Peace Conference (1991), the Wye River Memorandum (1995), Oslo II (1995), Taba (2001), Road Map for Peace (2003), and the Geneva Accord (2003). Some of these led to Israeli withdrawal from land it had occupied for security purposes, amid continued threats and terrorism, following the 1967 War. These withdrawals predictably led to more terror attacks from Arab regions.

To Israel’s enemies, talks and agreements are incremental steps toward their ultimate goal of annihilating the Jewish state. Two examples: According to the Endowment for Middle East Truth, 16 years after Oslo, in 2009, the official of the terrorist organization Fatah continues to affirm “armed struggle” against Israel. And the Palestinian Authority continues to practice incitement against Israel through student textbooks, television programs, sermons, editorials and the naming of public streets and buildings after terrorist “martyrs.”

At the upcoming talks in Washington, the issues will likely be the same as Camp David 2000:

• Jerusalem. The Palestinian demand for a “right of return” for “refugees” and their descendants to places in Israel from which the original “refugees” claim to have come. This would overwhelm Israel, which is the point of the demand.

• Territorial compromise (again). Agreement on the legitimacy of Israel’s sovereignty in the region, producing an end to the war and termination of future claims, which Hamas and Hezbollah have promised never to accept.

• If the all-too-familiar scenario plays out, Israel will give up more land, the Palestinians will make more promises that, like the others, they will break and more riots and terrorism will follow under the pretext that Israel has not ceded enough. After the maximum propaganda value has been extracted, the Palestinians will agree to more talks and the scenario will be replayed.

To top it off, the Obama administration has assured Israel that Iran is not an “imminent” nuclear threat. This claim has been made before and then withdrawn. Why should it have credence now?

The United States and the West have learned nothing from history and, thus, are doomed to repeat it.

(C)2010 Tribune Media Services

Read more:

Written by twelvebooks

August 27, 2010 at 6:45 pm