Twelve Books – Rapture, Antichrist, False Prophet, End Time Signs, Bible Prophecy, Nando

End Times Bible Prophecy News and Articles

Archive for September 24th, 2010

September 24, 2010 Rapture at the date that Noah entered the Ark

Ron Reese has written an article equating the day that Noah entered the ark witht he day of the Rapture of the church.

His arguments are valid as to the timing of the Rapture based on his Bible interpretation. We are very close to the dates he gives.

There is a possibility that the Rapture could occur in the Feast of Tabernacles also and that ends at the end of September.

Nando

HI FELLOW WATCHMEN,
ON OCT. 24, 2009, EXACTLY ONE PROPHETIC YEAR OF 360 DAYS, AFTER THE FINAL 7 YEARS BEGAN ON OCT. 29, 2008, THE LORD SHOWED ME THAT THE KEYS TO THE TIMING OF THE RAPTURE COULD BE FOUND IN THE STORIES OF JOSEPH, NOAH, AND MOSES.
IN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POSTS, USING THE STORY OF JOSEPH AS THE MOST COMPLETE TYPE OF JESUS IN THE ENTIRE WORD OF GOD, WE HAVE LEARNED FROM GENESIS 45, THE STORY OF THE 7-YEAR FAMINE, THAT OUR GREAT AND MIGHTY DELIVERANCE SHOULD TAKE PLACE TWO FULL YEARS INTO THE FINAL 7 YEARS.  THOSE TWO FULL PROPHETIC YEARS WILL SOON END ON OCT. 19, 2010.  WE HAVE EVERY REASON TO EXPECT OUR GREAT DELIVERANCE, THE RAPTURE, TO TAKE PLACE AROUND THIS DATE, OR SHORTLY THEREAFTER.
NOW LET’S EXAMINE THE STORY OF NOAH TO SEE IF WE CAN NARROW THE TIME FRAME OF THE RAPTURE DOWN EVEN FURTHER.  IN MATTHEW 24: 37–42, JESUS SAYS, “BUT AS THE DAYS OF NOAH WERE, SO SHALL ALSO THE COMING OF THE SON OF MAN BE.  FOR AS IN THE DAYS THAT WERE BEFORE THE FLOOD, THEY WERE EATING AND DRINKING, MARRYING AND GIVING IN MARRIAGE, UNTIL THE DAY THAT NOAH ENTERED INTO THE ARK, AND KNEW NOT UNTIL THE FLOOD CAME, AND TOOK THEM ALL AWAY; SO SHALL ALSO THE COMING OF THE SON OF MAN BE.  THEN SHALL TWO BE IN THE FIELD; THE ONE SHALL BE TAKEN, AND THE OTHER LEFT.  TWO WOMEN SHALL BE GRINDING AT THE MILL; THE ONE SHALL BE TAKEN, AND THE OTHER LEFT.  WATCH THEREFORE;  FOR YE KNOW NOT WHAT HOUR YOUR LORD DOTH COME.”
PLEASE NOTICE THAT IN THIS LAST SENTENCE, JESUS DOES NOT SAY THAT YOU WILL NOT KNOW THE DAY AND HOUR.  HE ONLY SAYS THE HOUR WILL NOT BE KNOWN.  COULD THE REASON BE THAT HE JUST GAVE US THE DAY???  THE DAY THAT NOAH ENTERED THE ARK IS THE DAY THAT THE GREAT DELIVERANCE (THE RAPTURE) CAME.
IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT OUR LORD IS DESCRIBING THE RAPTURE, WITH ONE TAKEN AND ONE LEFT BEHIND.  IS OUR LORD TELLING US THAT THERE IS MUCH MORE THAN WE HAVE REALIZED CONCERNING “AS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH, SO SHALL IT ALSO BE IN THE DAYS OF THE COMING OF THE SON OF MAN (JESUS)???  IS OUR LORD JESUS TELLING US THAT THE SAME DAY THAT THE SUDDEN DESTRUCTION AND THE GREAT DELIVERANCE FOR NOAH AND HIS FAMILY TOOK PLACE, WILL BE THE VERY SAME DAY AS OUR SUDDEN DESTRUCTION/RAPTURE???
IF THE KEY PHRASE HERE IS “THE DAY THAT NOAH ENTERED INTO THE ARK”, LET’S LOOK AT THE STORY OF NOAH IN GENESIS.  GEN. 6:18 SAYS, “AND THOU SHALT COME INTO THE ARK, THOU, AND THY SONS, AND THY WIFE, AND THY SONS’ WIVES WITH THEE.  IN GEN. 7:4, NOAH RECEIVES HIS SEVEN-DAY WARNING, “FOR YET SEVEN DAYS, AND I WILL CAUSE IT TO RAIN UPON THE EARTH FORTY DAYS AND FORTY NIGHTS.”
GEN. 7:11 SAYS, “IN THE SECOND MONTH, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF THE MONTH, THE SAME DAY WERE ALL THE FOUNTAINS OF THE GREAT DEEP BROKEN UP, AND THE WINDOW OF HEAVEN WERE OPENED.”  IT IS COMMONLY ACCEPTED BY BIBLE SCHOLARS THAT CHESVAN 17 WAS THE DAY THAT THE GREAT FLOOD STARTED, WHICH WOULD MAKE THE 7-DAY WARNING ON CHESVAN 10.
PLEASE NOTICE THAT GOD HAD ALREADY MADE UP HIS MIND WHO WOULD ENTER THE ARK, BEFORE THE 7-DAY WARNING TOOK PLACE.  NOTHING CHANGED AS TO WHO TOOK PLACE IN THE GREAT DELIVERANCE.  IN MATTHEW 24, WE LEARNED THAT THOSE WHO WERE NOT PREPARED FOR THE RAPTURE, DID NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT WAS ABOUT TO HAPPEN.
ALSO, IN 1ST THESS. 5, WE LEARN THAT THE LORD IS COMING AS A THIEF TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT READY.  IF WE ARE TO RECEIVE A 7-DAY WARNING, IT IS APPARENT IT WILL NOT BE FOR THE NON-BELIEVERS.  IT WILL ONLY BE FOR THE WATCHFUL CHRISTIANS.  GOD ONLY TOLD NOAH.  PLEASE DO NOT DEPEND ON A 7-DAY WARNING TO TRY TO GET YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS RAPTURE-READY AT THE LAST MINUTE.  THE SCRIPTURES TEACH US THAT IT WILL NOT HAPPEN THAT WAY.  IT APPEARS WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF TIME LEFT, BUT VERY, VERY LITTLE TIME.  WARN THEM NOW BEFORE IT IS ETERNALLY TOO LATE!!!
THE BIG QUESTION NOW IS, “WHICH DAY DID NOAH ENTER THE ARK, CHESVAN 10 OR CHESVAN 17?”  THERE IS A SLIM CHANCE THAT IT COULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE DAYS IN BETWEEN THESE DATES.  AS WE ARE ABOUT TO ENTER OCTOBER, IT MAY BECOME CRUCIAL TO THE TIMING OF THE RAPTURE, IF INDEED JESUS WAS TELLING US THAT OUR RAPTURE/SUDDEN DESTRUCTION WAS THE VERY SAME DAY THAT NOAH ENTERED THE ARK.
AGAIN, WE MUST ASK OURSELVES, IS IT JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THE TWO YEARS INTO THE FINAL 7 YEARS TAKES PLACE IN LATE OCTOBER OF 2010?
IS IT JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THE DAY THAT NOAH ENTERED INTO THE ARK TAKES PLACE IN LATE OCTOBER OF 2010?
IS IT JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THE PEACE AND SAFETY TALKS (1ST THESS. 5) WILL BE HEATING UP IN LATE OCTOBER?
IS IT JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT WORLD WAR 3 SEEMS TO BE SO VERY CLOSE AT HAND, ESPECIALLY THE TRIGGER POINT OF THE MIDDLE EAST AND ISRAEL?
IS IT JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THE BEST TIME FOR AN OCTOBER SURPRISE IN ORDER TO INDEFINITELY POSTPONE THE PROPOSED NOV. ELECTIONS, THUS CONTINUING THE DESTRUCTION OF THE U.S. BY OBAMA, THE ANTICHRIST, WOULD BE LATE OCTOBER OF 2010?
JESUS SAID THAT WE COULD KNOW WHEN THE TIME WAS NEAR, EVEN AT THE DOORS.  IT SURE APPEARS TO BE AT THE DOORS, SO IT IS NOT LIKELY TO BE ALL A COINCIDENCE.
MY NEXT TWO POSTS WILL BE ENTITLED THE FOLLOWING:
COMPELLING EVIDENCE THAT POINTS TO OCT. 18–20, 2010
COMPELLING EVIDENCE THAT POINTS TO OCT. 25–27, 2010
THESE DATES REPRESENT THE POSSIBLE DATES FOR CHESVAN 10 AND CHESVAN 17.  WILL BOTH DATES PROVE TO BE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT?
IF NOTHING HAPPENS IN LATE OCTOBER, WHICH DOES NOT SEEM VERY LIKELY AT THIS POINT, I WILL CONTINUE TO SAY THAT WE HAVE EVERY REASON TO EXPECT THE RAPTURE/SUDDEN DESTRUCTION TO TAKE PLACE IN THE FALL OF 2010.
SOON AND VERY SOON, WE ARE GOING TO SEE THE KING!!!
MARANATHA!
RON REESE
RGREESE49@AOL.COM
Advertisements

Written by twelvebooks

September 24, 2010 at 7:26 pm

Posted in Rapture

Bruce Baber (24 Sep 2010) “To Jen re Ariel Sharon and news that he is going home!”

This post refers a link to the video of the Rabbi that said the Ariel Sharon prophecy. Thank you for the link Bruce.

Nando

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/sep2010/bruceb924-2.htm

Bruce Baber (24 Sep 2010)
To Jen re Ariel Sharon and news that he is going home!


Jen,

Your news that Ariel Sharon’s family is finally taking him home is indeed interesting in light of the prophecy that was given!  The short video with Rabbi Kaduri’s revelation about Jesus being the Messiah and that He would return after Ariel Sharon dies is below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eATJ4PRXEJk

We have to watch and see if Ariel Sharon dies shortly after going home with his family.  Jen, maybe very soon we will all get to go home!

YBIC

Bruce Baber

Written by twelvebooks

September 24, 2010 at 2:57 pm

Sept 23, 2010 Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

The article expresses the thinking that Obama and the people that are behind his ascendancy will do anything to keep him and their plan going.

Nando

http://www.prisonplanet.com/will-obama-force-america-to-absorb-a-terror-attack-to-save-his-presidency.html

Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

Ominous words suggest desperate administration could turn to false flag in bid to crush resistance against big government

undefined

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, September 22, 2010

President Obama’s ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack will have many fearing that staging some kind of false flag event will be the only way the government can overturn the massive resistance to big government that has grown exponentially since Obama took office.

During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

However, the only thing that was made stronger by 9/11 was the federal government’s power to harass, shake down and spy on the American people, as was exemplified yet again recently when Pennsylvania’s Office of Homeland Security was caught conducting surveillance on peaceful protest groups with the aid of an Israeli security company who listed Second Amendment groups amongst others as terrorists.

Given how both Bush and Clinton before him exploited terror attacks on U.S. soil to boost their flagging political agendas, we should be wary of Obama and his masters making good use of their own “October surprise” to counter record low approval figures for Congress on the eve of the midterm elections.

Talk show hosts such as Michael Savage have long been warning of a “Reichstag fire-like event” would be concocted to reinvigorate support behind Obama and given that his advisors include such ruthless individuals as Rahm Emanuel, the knife wielding son of a former Israeli terrorist who was involved in bombing hotels, marketplaces as well as massacres, we would be naive to put anything past these people.

Indeed, it was only two months ago that former Clinton advisor Robert Shapiro wrote in the Financial Times that the only thing that could save Obama’s tenuous grip on power was a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro was clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.

Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wing extremists. As Jack Cashill points out, Clinton “descended on Oklahoma City with an approval rating in the low 40s and left town with a rating well above 50 and the Republican revolution buried in the rubble.”

Only by exploiting a domestic terror attack which can be blamed on right-wing radicals, or by rallying the country round another war in the middle east, can Obama hope to reverse the tide of anti-incumbency candidates that threaten to drastically dilute the power monopoly of establishment candidates from both major political parties in Washington.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Will Obama Force America To Absorb A Terror Attack To Save His Presidency? 150709banner2

Shapiro is by no means the first to point out that terror attacks on U.S. soil and indeed anywhere in the world serve only to benefit those in positions of power.

During the latter years of the Bush presidency, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld mused with Pentagon top brass that shrinking Capitol Hill support for expanding the war on terror could be corrected with the aid of another terror attack.

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.”

The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would “validate” the President’s war on terror and “restore his image as a leader of the American people.”

In June 2007, the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

The Obama administration has proven itself to be alarmingly adept at lying about every issue under the sun, so why should we believe any different when it comes to the terror threat to America?

Using terror or the threat of terror as a political tool has been a routine ploy in recent years, and was acknowledged by former Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge when he admitted he was forced to issue fake terror alerts shortly before elections to influence the outcome.

Threatening terror has also been a tactic of some of Obama’s biggest supporters in the Democratic party, people like former Senator Gary Hart, who in 2007 wrote a thinly veiled threat to Iranian leaders pointing out that the U.S. has been involved in numerous staged provocations over the years to achieve political agendas, mentioning specifically the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the sinking of the Maine.

Given the documented history of staged false flag events being used to manipulate both domestic and geopolitical affairs, added to the numerous threats of such provocations from several highly respected political operatives, it would be foolish to rule out the notion that the Obama administration could turn to such desperate measures in a last gasp effort to salvage power and demonize its growing legions of political adversaries.

Written by twelvebooks

September 24, 2010 at 2:59 am

Sept 23, 2010 Forget $1,300, Gold Is Heading To $11,000 On Dollar Collapse

Is the price of gold going through the roof?

This article seems to think so.

Many people I know will regret not taking the advice I gave them.

Nando

http://www.prisonplanet.com/forget-1300-gold-is-heading-to-11000-on-dollar-collapse.html

Forget $1,300, Gold Is Heading To $11,000 On Dollar Collapse

The Alex Jones Channel

Written by twelvebooks

September 24, 2010 at 2:53 am

Sept 23, 2010 Albert Edwards On Terminal Competitive Devaluation, The Nuclear Option, And How The Fed’s Policies May Start An All Out War

This economic article is very important. The article is very long and technical and I am giving the link and title before I have had time to read it all. From the part that I read I feel that the readers of this blog should do well in reading and trying to understand the things that are involved here.

They are talking about serious economic problems with the capacity to destabilize the world social order.

Are we seeing the beginnings of a world economic and possible physical war?

Nando

Renee M (URL) Albert Edwards On Terminal Competitive Devaluation, The Nuclear Option, And How The Fed’s Policies May Start An All Out War

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/albert-edwards-terminal-competitive-devaluation-nuclear-option-and-how-feds-policies-may-sta

Albert Edwards On Terminal Competitive Devaluation, The Nuclear Option, And How The Fed’s Policies May Start An All Out War

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/21/2010 18:06 -0500

Written by twelvebooks

September 24, 2010 at 12:10 am